🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities issued a warning that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.